W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2006

EOWG: Agenda for 10 February 2006 Teleconference

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:14:00 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20060209140231.0403e9f0@localhost>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Dear EOWG Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 10 February 2006 teleconference follow.

Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
        http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:      Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

SCRIBE:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html

1. Outreach updates (brief)
- Please send to the EOWG mailing list in advance, and note any trends or 
issues for EOWG discussion.

2. Proposal to change from weekly "outreach updates" to "trends and issues"
- Discussion

3. Review Teams for Evaluating Web Accessibility
Continuing our updating of the Evaluation Resource Suite, please review the 
following materials with regard to Review Teams for Web Accessibility.
         Current (old) version:
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/reviewteams.html
         Proposed requirements, for review, discussion and approval(?)
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-teams.html#about
         Proposed changes for review (changelog may be updated again before 
the meeting)
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-teams.html#changes
*       Revised draft
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/reviewteams-20060209.html

         Questions for discussion on "Review Teams for Evaluating Web 
Accessibility"
         a) Does the introduction work better organized this way?
         b) How is the tone of the document now?
         c) Does the detail in "Types of Review Teams" work well (or not...)?
         d) Suggestions on how to improve & better balance the "Best 
Practices" section?
         e) Do the subsection headers work better?
         f) Other thoughts on updating alignment w/ the rest of the suite?

4. Initial discussion of Agenda for EOWG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary
         Ideas from Shawn and Judy (we'll present a few ideas)
         Other ideas on topics
         Ideas on how to best structure the time across the three days of 
EOWG meeting

Regards,
~ Shawn & Judy

===

IRC reminders and tips:
- IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All 
substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
- to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type 
/me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
will come out:
*shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/

* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

###


-- 
Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:14:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:39 GMT