On Fri, 5 May 2006, Judy Brewer wrote: > 4. Add a prominent link from the introduction of the baseline section to > the conformance section of WCAG 2.0, and remove redundant info about > conformance from the baseline document itself. (Note that, for now, we are > not recommending the removal of information about baseline from the > conformance section of WCAG 2.0.) I guess the sentence in parentheses above reflects that the EOWG discussion on this is still ongoing - hence the "for now". My own tuppence worth, even at this stage, is to suggest that the conformance section of WCAG 2.0 should best limit itself to normative requirements; and the advisory/informative stuff should be delegated, as far as possible, to the "About baselines" document. This would specifically include most of "Who sets baselines?" (as already suggested by Alan, I think). But as I say, this is ongoing discussion, so I am happy to see all the comments passed on immediately, per Judy's current draft. Best - Barry.Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 15:15:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2007 03:28:01 GMT