W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Inaccessible Compliant Sites

From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:38:23 +0200
Message-Id: <AF1A513A-AFA1-4B20-B5FF-0D7CF504D504@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
To: Wayne Dick ' <Wed@csulb.edu>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Wayne,
I strongly agree with you about title of the document "Understanding  
WCAG 2.0" [1] [2]


Regards
ciao

~ pasquale


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005OctDec/0120.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2006JanMar/0008.html









Il giorno 01/mag/06, alle ore 04:06, Wayne Dick ' ha scritto:

> Hi Group,
>
> To me the title "Understanding WCAG 2.0" is missleading.  If you  
> don't understand POUR or the numbering scheme.  It is a great link  
> from WCAG 2.0, but it doesn't stand alone.  It reads like a  
> glossary.  If I was a first looking into WCAG 2.0, I'd read the  
> "Understanding..." document first, and it would go down well.  In  
> fact, I'd probably quit.
>
> So, I suggest an informal but accurate name like "A Careful Walk  
> Through the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines".  The introduction should briefly  
> recap the principles with a link to the section "The Four  
> Principles of Accessibility " of WCAG.  It should also explain the  
> guideline numbering scheme.  Also, there should be an explanation  
> that this is not an overview to be read before launching into the  
> Guidelines.  Instead it should state that it is meant to be read  
> with the guidelines to expand on and explain difficult details of  
> the individual guidelines.
>
> Does anyone else share this feeing?
>
> Wayne
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 05:38:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT