W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: EOWG: Agenda and Readings for teleconference 30 September 2005

From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:17:07 -0400
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20050930001022.01fa6250@pop.rcn.com>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>,"EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

At 11:46 PM 9/28/2005, Shawn Henry wrote:

>EOWG:
>
>Readings, an agenda, and calling logistics for our 30 September 2005 
>teleconference follow.
>
>Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
>             http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
>Bridge:   +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
>IRC:      channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
>
>SCRIBE:   Andrew, per: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
>READINGS: Involving Users documents listed under #2 below
>
>1. Outreach updates (brief)
>- please send to EOWG mailing list in advance, note any trends or 
>issues for EOWG discussion
>
>2. Involving Users in Web Accessibility Evaluation
>* [DRAFT] Involving Users in Web Accessibility Evaluation
>            http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users.html
>* Requirements and Changelog for "Involving Users in Web 
>Accessibility Evaluation"
>            http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut
>* previous drafts:
>            http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users-old.html
>            http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users-old2.html
>
>Review & Discussion Questions:
>
>2.1. How does this draft address the issues raised in previous 
>discussions & in comments?
>See references: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#refs
>and changes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#changes
>
>2.2. Are there any new issues with this draft?
>See especially the [notes for reviewers] under: 
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#2005-09-28
>
>2.3. Imagine different audiences, e.g.:
>- Web developer in small design firm whose knowledge is mostly 
>technical, not accessibility or usability testing
>- Web accessibility tester who only knows how to use evaluation 
>tools and a little manual checking, has never involved users
>- manager who has been asked to provide money for her staff to 
>involve users with disabilities in accessibility evaluation
>- usability professional who knows nothing about accessibility
>- and others listed at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/redesign/users.html#list

Missing on that list are lawyers -- don't we somewhere suggest legal 
liability for inaccessible web presence?

>How does this document work for different audiences?
>
>2.4. Other than any remaining open issues [marked with @@] and the 
>terminology section at the end, is this draft ready for sign off to 
>publish it as Version 1?
>
>Regards,
>~ Shawn & Judy
>
>===
>
>IRC reminders and tips:
>* IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have 
>IRC. All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call 
>(not just in IRC).
>* to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the 
>minutes, type /me comment - e.g.:
>         /me hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
>- will come out:
>         *shawn hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
>
>Teleconference information:
>- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
>- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
>- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
>- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
>
>* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
>
>###
Received on Friday, 30 September 2005 04:17:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:38 GMT