W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2005

EOWG: Agenda and Readings for teleconference 16 September 2005

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:32:20 -0500
Message-ID: <43285EA4.1010802@w3.org>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

EOWG:

Readings, an agenda, and calling logistics for our 16 September 2005 teleconference follow.

Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
         	 http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:   +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:      channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

SCRIBE:   Jack, per: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
READINGS: Including Users documents listed under #2 below

1. Outreach updates (brief)
- please send to EOWG mailing list in advance, note any trends or issues for EOWG discussion

2. Including Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility
* Requirements and Changelog for "Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users"
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut
* [EARLY ROUGH ROUGH DRAFT] Including Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users.html
* previous concept draft:
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users-old.html

Note: This is an early rough draft, that is very rough. Please focus on the overall approach and content. For this review, do not focus on detailed wording and such.

Review & Discussion Questions:
2.1. Overall reactions?

2.2. How does this draft address the issues raised in previous discussions & comments?
See references: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#refs

2.3. Does this draft put "usability testing" in it's appropriate place? Have we swung too far the other way?

2.4. Are there things from the previous concept draft that are missing that should be put back in?
See list at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#2005-09-13

2.5. Are there any new issues with this draft?

2.6. How about the section "Include Diverse Users"? Is it the appropriate level of coverage, or should it be cut down significantly?

2.7. Imagine different audiences, e.g.:
- Web developer in small design firm whose knowledge is mostly technical, not accessibility or usability testing
- Web accessibility tester who only knows how to use evaluation tools and a little manual checking, has never involved users
- manager who has been asked to provide money for her staff to involve users with disabilities in accessibility evaluation
- usability professional who knows nothing about accessibility
- and others listed at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/redesign/users.html#list
How does this document work for different audiences?

2.8. How does the title work? How is it for translatability? Other thoughts for title?

3. Update on face-to-face meetings
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

Regards,
~ Shawn & Judy

===

IRC reminders and tips:
* IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
* to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type /me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
- will come out:     *shawn hopes Andrew had a good biking trip

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
- Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

###
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 17:32:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:38 GMT