W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2005

EOWG: Readings and Agenda for teleconference 2 September 2005

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:00:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4315A9FF.7050307@w3.org>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

EOWG:

Calling logistics and an agenda for our 2 September 2005 teleconference follow.

Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
          http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:   +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:      channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

SCRIBE:	  Wayne, per: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html

READINGS to prepare for teleconference described in e-mail "EOWG: Review this week: Evaluating with Users":
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005JulSep/0118.html

1. Outreach updates (brief)
- please send to EOWG mailing list in advance, note any trends or issues for EOWG discussion

2. Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users
* Requirements and Changelog for "Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users"
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut
* [EARLY CONCEPT DRAFT] Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users:
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users.html

Review Notes:
* it is an "early concept draft" - meaning it is just a rough outline, unformatted, with incomplete sentences, etc. 
* to get a quick overview, you can skim the words in bold (<strong> in HTML)
* stuff in curly brackets are quotes from another resource to give an idea of what we might say
* the content of each point is not representative of the amount we would be covering it - some points that would have a couple sentences have no notes yet, and others where we would only have one sentence already have more information than we would use

Review & Discussion Questions:
2.1. Overall reaction?
2.2. Does this include the points we want to cover? Is anything missing?
2.3. Are there things we can cut out of this (in order to make the document shorter)?
2.4. Are we meeting the needs of the identified audiences? (within reason, wanting to keep it short!) (Primary audience: Web developers (designers, content authors, etc.) who want to comply with Web accessibility standards; Secondary audiences: decision makers, professional evaluators, and accessibility researchers; Also: usability professionals)
2.5. What things need to be explained or defined? That is, what do we think most readers won't know and can't figure out easily?
2.6. How does this organization work? Other thoughts for organization?
2.7. How does the title work? How is it for translatability? Other thoughts for title?

Regards,
~ Shawn & Judy

===

IRC reminders and tips:
* IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
* to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type /me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
- will come out:     *shawn hopes Andrew had a good biking trip

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
- Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

###
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:00:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:38 GMT