W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2005

ATAG WD 22 Nov 2004 comments (1 of ?)

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:28:51 -0500
Message-ID: <41F10393.8040302@w3.org>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Some comments for the discussion:

1. section 1.4 Relationship with other guidelines and standards.
I strongly recommend:
- deleting all of the first section and referring to http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components.
- leaving section 1.4.1 (with any relevant, non-redundant material from the paragraph 2 before that section)
- leaving section 1.4.2 (with any relevant, non-redundant material from the paragraph right before section 1.4.1)

2. use of "format" versus something like "technical specifications" ?
Glossary definition needs to be made more clear - perhaps just by adding examples.

3. In the success criterium, the terminology "must always conform" is awkward. Why not simple "conforms"? e.g.:
- current: "At least one full-featured Web-based authoring interface must always conform to WCAG."
- suggested: "At least one full-featured Web-based authoring interface conforms to WCAG."
If concerned about "always", could put that in the preface text.

~ Shawn
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 13:28:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:37 GMT