Some comments for the discussion: 1. section 1.4 Relationship with other guidelines and standards. I strongly recommend: - deleting all of the first section and referring to http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components. - leaving section 1.4.1 (with any relevant, non-redundant material from the paragraph 2 before that section) - leaving section 1.4.2 (with any relevant, non-redundant material from the paragraph right before section 1.4.1) 2. use of "format" versus something like "technical specifications" ? Glossary definition needs to be made more clear - perhaps just by adding examples. 3. In the success criterium, the terminology "must always conform" is awkward. Why not simple "conforms"? e.g.: - current: "At least one full-featured Web-based authoring interface must always conform to WCAG." - suggested: "At least one full-featured Web-based authoring interface conforms to WCAG." If concerned about "always", could put that in the preface text. ~ ShawnReceived on Friday, 21 January 2005 13:28:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 10:45:54 GMT