W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Strikethrough

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
cc: <Julie.Howell@rnib.org.uk>, <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0205221230560.30877-100000@tux.w3.org>
The del element is correct HTML for dong this - applying a strikethrough
style to something else is risky and contravenes a WCAG priority 1
checkpoint. (So the question becomes whether there should be a specific note
that some screenreaders will not give a correct presentation of the
document).

Many browsers do implement ins and del - Lynx inserts a word at each end, and
most visual represenations I have seen use strikethrough.

cheers

Chaals

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:

  What about <del> (and <ins> for insertions) tag in html? Would that work?
  Then it would be possible to use CSS to present the del as strikethrough.

  Marja

  At 02:54 PM 5/22/2002 +0100, Julie.Howell@rnib.org.uk wrote:
  >Hello
  >
  >I was wondering if anyone on the list can help me with this enquiry.
  >
  >A member of staff at a local council in the UK has contacted me.  They are
  >putting a legal document on the web.  The document features use of
  >'strikethrough' to indicate to people reading the document that some phrases
  >are no longer valid.  However, some screenreaders are unable to interpret
  >strikethrough correctly.
  >
  >Can anyone suggest an effective solution?  I was wondering about the acronym
  >tag... should this be used to support the strikethrough text so that
  >screenreaders can read it?
  >
  >
  >---
  >Kind regards
  >Julie Howell
  >Campaigns Officer (Internet)
  >Royal National Institute for the Blind
  >105 Judd Street, London WC1H 9NE
  >julie.howell@rnib.org.uk
  >Phone +44 (0)20 7391 2191
  >Mobile +44 (0)7984-600089
  >Fax +44 (0)20 7391 2034
  >
  >2 million people in the UK experience sight loss or blindness.
  >Poor design prevents many disabled people from getting the most from the
  >Web.
  >Support RNIB's campaign for better Web design!
  >http://www.rnib.org.uk/digital
  >
  >Ask me for our campaign film (CD-Rom or VHS video): 'Web sites that work'
  >Ask me for our campaign report: 'Get the message online'
  >For news and event announcements join the campaign mailing list:
  >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RNIBCampaignforGoodWebDesign/join
  >
  >-
  >
  >NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
  >confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
  >intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
  >disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
  >you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
  >immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
  >system.
  >
  >RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
  >attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
  >cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
  >transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
  >
  >Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
  >and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
  >represent those of RNIB.
  >
  >RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
  >
  >Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
  >
  >14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to
  >find out all about it.



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:33:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:33 GMT