EOWG: FOR COMMENT PLEASE For discussion on the list, since we did not get to discuss in teleconference today: Please review section on "Considerations for specific contexts" which includes: - Evaluation during the development process - Ongoing monitoring - Evaluation of "frozen" sites Starter questions: - first piece of intro (development process) seems too wordy, can it be cut down - are the points listed in each of the three sub-sections relevant and important? - is the section on ongoing monitoring adequate for ensuring the really tough goal listed up in the overall introduction to this piece, e.g. providing assurance that a site will maintain a given conformance level in the future (note that I added a pointer from that goal down to this section) - is the section on frozen sites significant, or should it be thrown out? - other comments? Thanks, Judy -- Judy Brewer jbrewer@w3.org +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USAReceived on Friday, 27 July 2001 17:46:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 10:45:50 GMT