W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2001

IMHO this is a FAQ

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:46:43 -0400
Message-Id: <200107251333.JAA3130878@smtp2.mail.iamworld.net>
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
[I think that this question has been asked often enough to qualify]

Quick look:


In depth: source Gregg cites.

>Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:04:51 -0400 (EDT)
>Reply-To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
>From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
>To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>,
>        "GL - WAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)"
>Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:58:53 -0500
>Organization: Trace
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>Importance: Normal
>Subject: RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
>Resent-From: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> archive/latest/7051
>X-Loop: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>Sender: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <w3c-wai-gl.w3.org>
>List-Help: <<http://www.w3.org/Mail/>http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>Best source is THE source in this type of info
>Jeavons and Harding.
>They have written a number (many) articles on this and a book.
>Photosensitive Epilepsy (Clinics in Developmental Medicine, No 133)
>by Graham F.A. Harding, Peter M. Jeavons
>Amazon Price: $59.95
>-- ------------------------------
>Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>Professor - Human Factors
>Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
>Director - Trace R & D Center
>Gv@trace.wisc.edu <<mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>,
>FAX 608/262-8848 
>For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
>-----Original Message-----
>From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
[<mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org%5D>mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
>Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
>Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:26 AM
>To: Gregg Vanderheiden
>Cc: 'WAI GL'
>Subject: RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
>Hmm. I don't get the difference exactly - do you have examples or
>that explain it?
>And given that this is a checkpoint "until user agents ..." my question
>whether this can now be marked not applicable in al tests still stands.
>On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>  It is annoying -- and distracting -- but it doesn’t trigger the
>  guideline unless if flashes.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 09:33:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:48 UTC