- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 03:58:07 -0700
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
All Three: "Headlines" on main page seem "jarring" - what criterion put these particular items there? Should any be there? #7 & #9 The separate resources cell with links makes acceptable use of otherwise little used real estate. Since this section is likely the "meat" of what viewers seek, it might save a click here and there. However, if one wants to know to what she's jumping this is less informative than the more general links with extensive explanations seen on the left on all three pages. #8 The links mixed in with the explanations seem to sort of defeat the purpose of indirect links with explanations? "participation" page: opening paragraph should include individuals - as it is it sounds like it's only for organizations. Add parenthetical explanation for ATAG like the one for UA? "news" page: Is there process for inclusion of stuff in "upcoming events" e.g. PF * ER F2Fs in D.C.? "Search": Might consider limiting search to WAI or have separate entry field (or return link) for W3C search? I fixed the links on http://dicomp.pair.com/wai.htm -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 1 September 2000 06:56:17 UTC