W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: frames

From: James Allan <allan_jm@tsb1.tsbvi.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:46:54 -0500
To: E & O <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-id: <001301becf9a$0be31fe0$0100007f@localhost>
agree. drop attribute. If we are going to use "smallcap" bold for elements
and lowercase bold for attributes, then using "attribute" is redundant and
wastes space for more important material that is "written clearly"

Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of William Loughborough
Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 9:28 AM
To: E & O
Subject: Re: frames


Unless the decision to continue using the word "attribute" is required
by Tim or some stone-engraved rule, I think it should be dropped in all
three places it's used (1,6, and 8) in favor of denoting that the term
in question is an attribute by its typography, as is currently done with
"element".  If it is bold lower-case then the word "attribute" is a
*DUH* item.  Else why not use the word "element"?
--
Love.
            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Friday, 16 July 1999 10:50:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:25 GMT