- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:22:20 -0500
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
The latest proposal on image map was actually: >"Image maps. Use client-side MAP and text for each hotspot." > >OK? They can get the detail from the "complete guidelines & checklist" as advertised. ...which is appropriately ambigous but introduces the concept. ? Judy At 11:50 AM 2/11/99 -0500, Leonard R. Kasday wrote: > >>Use client-side MAP and provide text for each hotspot. >> > >I like that one. It is a bit ambiguous, but as I mentioned before (and as >Daniel and Charles recommended) that amgiguity is an advantage because if I >use it with someone I'm working with I can interpret it as AREA/ALT alone >or redundantly with separate text links, depending on what kind of >browser/screenreaders we can expect users to have. > >Len >------- >Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. >Universal Design Engineer, Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and >Adjunct Professor, Electrical Engineering >Temple University > >Ritter Hall Annex, Room 423, Philadelphia, PA 19122 >kasday@acm.org >(215} 204-2247 (voice) >(800) 750-7428 (TTY) > ---------- Judy Brewer jbrewer@w3.org +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 11 February 1999 12:21:06 UTC