- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 14:30:58 +0200
- To: "Stella O'Brien" <smo-brien@lioness.demon.co.uk>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
> 1 is there a need for different versions as suggested above? I'm not sure we need that for the ref card. First I'd need to understand how we intent to publich them, and to which audience, and when. But I'd rather not complicate our delivables set further and stick with one set of ref card, even if there is risk of obsolescence in the printed version. > 2 is the suggested content appropriate? If not, what would be? What you wrote is very relevant to what I want to see in the first press/article (broad educated/technical audience): mention what needs to be done, but not HOW, or not in details. As a follow-up to this message, I'm going to post my proposal for the "Article in Magazine/Press" deliverable.
Received on Thursday, 6 August 1998 08:37:49 UTC