Minutes from AUWG Teleconference on 12 Aug 2013 1:00pm-2:00pm ET

http://www.w3.org/2013/08/12-au-minutes.html

Full text:

12 Aug 2013

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jeanne, Jan, Alastair, Tom, Alex, Jutta, Tim_Boland
Regrets
Tim, B., (partial)
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan
Contents

Topics
1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)
2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan)
3. SURVEY - Just two questions.
Q1. EO2 - use of "MUST" in the Principles
Q2. EO3 comment on B.3.1.2
4. Implementation report update (Jan)
Summary of Action Items
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)

JS: No new news...still waiting for feedback from some groups before sending to AC
... Concers?
All: None
2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan)

JS: Judy has accepted the exit criteria...
... Have not yet had chance to meet with people from w3m
... We need to have a resolution to go to CR
... I also need to explain how SC changes aren't substantive...but 3 actually are
JT: Any concerns with "If changes are deemed to be substantial, the working group agrees to publish another working draft of ATAG 2.0 with the shortest allowed timeframe for comments."
JR: No objections
JT: No objects heard
Resolved: If changes are deemed to be substantial, the working group agrees to publish another working draft of ATAG 2.0 with the shortest allowed timeframe for comments.
JT: Next steps Jeanne?
JS: The only problem I expect is with re: to the "substantial changes"
... I have been working on a package of info
... Then I'm working on requirements .... back when we started there was no requirements for requirements
... Evidence of wide review...should be ok\
... Evidence of issues being addressed
... Objections...none
... Implementations...JR's document
... And patent disclosure...none
JT: How do we address?
JS: Is working on it... I'm tying to bring in items from other WAI groups.
JT: So we have a way forward?
JS: Yes, will let you know.
3. SURVEY - Just two questions.

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130807/
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130807/results
Q1. EO2 - use of "MUST" in the Principles

JT: All ok
Resolved: All agree to remove must from the principles
Q2. EO3 comment on B.3.1.2

<jeanne> B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the checker provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-ATAG20-20130627/#def-Checking
<AlastairC> last section: "instructions are provided as part of the authoring tool interface that describe how to decide."
<scribe> ACTION: JS to Remove "An authoring tool may support any combination of checking types." from the bullets [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/12-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-389 - Remove "an authoring tool may support any combination of checking types." from the bullets [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2013-08-19].
B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the authoring tool provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
JT: B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the accessibility checking process provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
... Any objections...
AL: Don't hear problems
Resolved: B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the accessibility checking process provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
4. Implementation report update (Jan)

TB: Getting some support on this internally
JT: OERPUB update... more accessibility prompting in the Sept release
JR: Looked at Pinterest...does prompting
JT: Also spoke to people in DAISY...EPub3 authorong enviornments...
... ... will include many ATAG prompting featrues
... DAISY will be publishing a list
... Any other implementatipn updates?
None heard
JT: Status updates?
AC: New Tiny MCE?
JT: JR can you and GG take a look?
JR: Word on EasyChirp?
TB: Haven't heard anything
<AlastairC> Update http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/dlembree/easy-chirp-2-contribute-to-an-inclusive-twittersph/posts/547644
JT: Continue monitoring
JR: Still looking for accessible IDEs
JT: we are at end of time?
... Other issues.
Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: JS to Remove "An authoring tool may support any combination of checking types." from the bullets [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/12-au-minutes.html#action01]


(MR) JAN RICHARDS
PROJECT MANAGER
INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
OCAD UNIVERSITY

T 416 977 6000 x3957
F 416 977 9844
E jrichards@ocadu.ca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocadu.ca]
> Sent: August-09-13 3:15 PM
> To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
> Subject: AUWG Teleconference on 12 Aug 2013 1:00pm-2:00pm ET
> 
> There will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 12 Aug 2013 at 1:00 pm-
> 2:00 pm ET:
> Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
> Zakim: +1.617.761.6200       (Boston)
> IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au
> 
> If people think they will arrive more than 15 minutes late, please send me an
> email beforehand.
> 
> Most Recent Editors Drafts
> =====================
> ATAG 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-ATAG20-20130627/
> 
> Implementing ATAG 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20130627/
> 
> Test Resources:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2-10April2012PublicWD-Tests
> 
> Implementation Report:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html
> 
> 
> Agenda
> ======
> 
> 1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)
> - we have an extension until September so we need to move quickly on CR
> - we have addressed comments received so far
> 
> 2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan)
> - On WAI-Coordination Group no issues raised with Exit Criteria by other WAI
> Chairs/Team
> - Exit Criteria sent to W3M for comments.
> 
> 3. SURVEY - Just two questions.
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130807/
> 
> 4. Implementation report update (Jan)
> - a number of other tools have been added (see top table)
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html
> - This week I've looked at Pinterest (it includes description prompts which it
> uses for alt text).
> 
> - Please send in your additions/edits in the following format:
>  SC#-Level-Product-Status
> E.g. A.1.1.1-LevelA-Drupal-Yes
> 
> 5. Other issues?
> 
> (MR) JAN RICHARDS
> PROJECT MANAGER
> INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
> OCAD UNIVERSITY
> 
> T 416 977 6000 x3957
> F 416 977 9844
> E jrichards@ocadu.ca
> 
>

Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 18:06:59 UTC