W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: Re: Towards a description of ATAG 2.0's approach to testing

From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 21:02:23 +0000
To: Greg Pisocky <gpisocky@adobe.com>, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0B1EB1C972BCB740B522ACBCD5F48DEB03AF5F72@ocadmail-maildb.ocad.ca>
Hi Greg,

I fully agree. If you see any tests that might be missing this, please let Jeanne or I know.


From: Greg Pisocky [mailto:gpisocky@adobe.com]
Sent: October-01-12 3:44 PM
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: Re: Towards a description of ATAG 2.0's approach to testing

The issue of producing accessible content is also something ATAG 2.0 addresses which should also be addressed in the testing. The application may be accessible, but the output or one of its many outputs may be inaccessible or highly inaccessible. If you use tools x which produces content in formats A, B, and C be aware that A and B are not terribly accessible and should be avoided in favor of C.


[Description: C:\Users\gpisocky\Downloads\Non Adobe\SnagIt\Adobe Brand Center\eMail Signature\Adobe_Corporate_Email_Signature_and_Instructions\adobe_logo_web.png]

Greg Pisocky
Sr. Business Development Mgr.
Adobe Accessibility

571.765.5410 (tel)
703.678.3541 (cell)

7930 Jones Branch Dr.
McLean, VA 22102

Adobe's Accessibility Resource Center | www.adobe.com/accessibility<http://www.adobe.com/accessibility>
Product Compliance Info | http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products/compliance/

(image/png attachment: image001.png)

Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 21:02:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:03 UTC