W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: AUWG Teleconference on 23 July 2012 3:00pm-4:00pm ET

From: Sueann Nichols <ssnichol@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:20:54 -0400
To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
Cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF70C286BD.EC1579F6-ON85257A44.0064C35D-85257A44.0064CA8C@us.ibm.com>

Regrets.

Sueann Nichols

Phone: (720) 396-6739 (t/l) 938-6739
ssnichol@us.ibm.com
IBM Human Ability & Accessibility Center
http://www.ibm.com/able



From:	"Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
To:	"w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>,
Date:	07/20/2012 04:23 PM
Subject:	AUWG Teleconference on 23 July 2012 3:00pm-4:00pm ET



There will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 23 July 2012 at 3:00 pm-
4:00 pm ET:
Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
Zakim: +1.617.761.6200       (Boston)
IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au

If people think they will arrive more than 15 minutes late, please send me
an email beforehand.

Last Call Drafts
===========
http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/
http://www.w3.org/TR/IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20/

Agenda
======

1. AUWG test development to prepare for entering CR:
- As discussed last week, everyone (besides the few that spoke up about
conflicts) were going to try to write at least one test.

2. SC's that we might flag as a result of test writing. So far:
- B.4.1.3 Feature Availability Information: If the authoring tool supports
production of any web content technologies for publishing for which the
authoring tool does not provide support for the production of accessible
web content (WCAG), then this is documented. (Level AA)
- Note: This success criterion concerns the presence or absence of support
features, such as accessibility checkers, not any intrinsic property of web
content technologies.
@ISSUE: This is tricky because the SC just says "support for production",
not that the production of the other format needs to meet ATAG 2.0. This
makes some sense because if it did imply ATAG 2.0 conformance then to do an
ATAG 2.0 conformance check on any format for a tool would actually require
doing one on all of them. But, what, then, does "support" mean? One (weak)
possibility is [the test I wrote]... that accessible content be possible.
Another (stronger) possibility is that a "supported" format has to have
checking (even if it is manual checking). If that's what we mean...I think
we should fix the SC to say that.
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JulSep/0013.html)

3. Selecting new tests to write (each member will choose at least one SC to
write tests for the next week)



Cheers,
Jan

(MR) JAN RICHARDS
PROJECT MANAGER
INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)

T 416 977 6000 x3957
F 416 977 9844
E jrichards@ocadu.ca

Twitter @OCAD
Facebook www.facebook.com/OCADUniversity

OCAD UNIVERSITY
205 Richmond Street West, 2nd Floor, Toronto, Canada  M5V 1V3
www.ocadu.ca
idrc.ocadu.ca





graycol.gif
(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 19:12:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 July 2012 19:12:17 GMT