W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2011

re: Details for Monday (31 Oct 2011)'s Extended AUWG Teleconference (noon-5:00pm ET) - Note: The Connect Details

From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:31:43 +0000
To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0B1EB1C972BCB740B522ACBCD5F48DEB03976A1C@ocadmail-maildb.ocad.ca>
Updated Agenda:
===============
Goal: Attempting to come to consensus on all remaining blocker issues (identified here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0040.html) except WCAG-WG's issue.

1. MS2: The biggest concern for ATAG 2.0 is that it is never clear if ATAG is for a single tool or a collection of tools. It is trying to be both. This leads to a great deal of structural problems....
Proposal: Yes (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0045.html)

2. MS3: Most touch screen devices do not use the keyboard for navigation. Keyboard is only used for text input. The current definition of keyboard interface does not work ...
Proposal: Yes (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/att-0031/ATAG2-21July2011PublicWD-CommentResponses-rev20111017.html)

3. MS1 (related to MS1 on previous public draft): The concept of "automatically generate" content does not appear well defined. In the example where the developer changes the template of a content management system illustrates the issue. How is a template changed or configured by a developer considered "automatic"?
Proposal: Not yet (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0049.html)

4. MS7:
What are "restructuring transformations" and "recoding transformations"? We think the concept of "accessibility information" needs reexamination....
Proposal: Not yet (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0048.html)

5. TL17:
I'm uncertain how (b) [in B.2.2.3 Technology Decision Support] will be remotely useful to the user....
Proposal: Yes (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/att-0031/ATAG2-21July2011PublicWD-CommentResponses-rev20111017.html)

6. IBM1:
I do have a concern with one of the blocking issues raised on the conformance claim.  Why is ATAG not using the same or very similar conformance claim from WCAG 2.0?...
Proposal: Yes (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0046.html)

BREAK (MAY OCCUR EARLIER)

7. Walking the proposed responses table for unapproved comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/att-0031/ATAG2-21July2011PublicWD-CommentResponses-rev20111017.html 

#tl1
#tl5
#ms3
#tl7
#tl8
#tl9
#tl11
#tl12
SKIP #tl13
#ms4
#ms6
#ms9a
#tl16
SKIP #ms8
#tl18
#tl19
#ms10
#tl20
#tl21
#tl22
#tl26
SKIP #wso1
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 18:41:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 October 2011 18:41:03 GMT