RE: AUWG Teleconference on 28 February 2011 4:00pm-5pm ET

Hi all,

I wasn't able to organize a survey this week, but having people's thoughts down ahead of time is really valuable...

So especially for:
"2. Updated proposals on ATAG2 defns of author and authoring tool
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0053.html"

it would be great if people could send thoughts to the list prior to the call (and this is of course even more important for anyone who will be missing the call).

Cheers,
Jan

-- 
(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844
Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/
Faculty of Design | OCAD University


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of Richards, Jan
> Sent: February 25, 2011 2:04 PM
> To: AUWG
> Subject: AUWG Teleconference on 28 February 2011 4:00pm-5pm ET
> 
> There will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 28 February 2011 at 4:00 pm -
> 5:00 pm ET:
> 
> Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
> IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au
> 
> If people think they will arrive more than 15 minutes late, please send
> me an email beforehand.
> 
> Editor's Draft:
> ===============
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20110211/
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20110211/
> 
> The dial-in numbers for Zakim are now:
> ======================================
> +1.617.761.6200	(Boston)
> +33.4.26.46.79.03	(Paris)
> +44.203.318.0479	(London)
> 
> Agenda:
> ========
> 
> 1. Note on what "not applicable" means and how to use it
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0052.html
> 
> 2. Updated proposals on ATAG2 defns of author and authoring tool
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0053.html
> Prev proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0039.html
> 
> 3. Series of long-waiting non-normative (and hopefully minor) edits marked
> with a single "@":
> 
> - @U.S. Section 508 Standards
> - @There are two ways to meet this success criterion...
> - @Web-based WYSIWYG: A web-based WYSIWYG editing-view is implemented so that
> videos placed into the content are rendered. If the videos include captions
> these are displayed.
> - @Undo queue: An authoring tool saves author actions in a "last-in-last-out"
> queue. When the author "undoes" an action, the action is removed from the
> queue.
> - @The note acknowledges that there are automatic behaviors that may be
> specified by other parties, and that author actions may purposefully or
> inadvertently affect the accessibility of the content generated later.
> - @Email archive: An automatic email archiving system automatically creates
> web pages from each email message that it receives. It has been designed to
> generate accessible markup, but if email messages contain accessibility
> problems, the archiving system is not able to rectify them.
> - @Social networking application: A social networking application collects
> some limited information from authors (e.g. name, gender, status updates,
> etc.) which it uses to personalize an automatically generated web application.
> - @that authors are made aware...
> - @Warning when text is converted to graphics (meets (b)):
> - @Copy and paste as transformation (meets (b)):
> - @ Intent of Success Criterion B.1.2.2: The intent of this success criterion
> is to ensure that web content transformations intended only to optimize
> content do not result in the introduction of web content accessibility
> problems.
> - @Pretty-print: A "pretty-print" tool reformats markup code to make it easier
> to read by programmers. The tool never makes changes to the markup tags.
> - @Video compression: A tool that compresses video does not automatically
> delete text tracks or secondary audio tracks.
> - @ Intent of Success Criterion B.1.2.3: The intent of this success criterion
> is to increase the likelihood that text alternatives will be preserved by web
> content transformations. This is especially important because text
> alternatives, such as labels and long descriptions, can represent substantial
> investments of author effort.
> - @Save as HTML: A word processor includes a "Save as Simple HTML"...
> - @Intent of Success Criterion B.2.2.2: The intent of this success criterion
> - @ (e.g. an "Image Properties" dialog).
> - @Silverlight, Flex
> 
> 4. What to do about B.2.1.1 - hopefully there will be a proposal before the
> call.
> 
> 
> Future meetings:
> ================
> Feb. 28
> Mar. 7
> Mar. 14
> Mar. 21
> Mar. 28
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan
> 
> 
> --
> (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
> jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844
> Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/
> Faculty of Design | OCAD University
> 
>

Received on Friday, 25 February 2011 19:21:10 UTC