W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2011

RE: Proposed ATAG2 Timeline

From: Cherie Ekholm <cheriee@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:49:49 +0000
To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocad.ca>, Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
CC: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F40857B9CA74BA46B36FF2D4C4CE6B782ED67A85@DF-M14-05.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
I'm not sure. I honestly can't read the schedule this way, so I don't understand the dates in relation to one another. Give me some time to set them up into a format where I can make sense of them and I'll let you know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocad.ca] 
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 1:48 PM
To: Cherie Ekholm; Jeanne Spellman
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: RE: Proposed ATAG2 Timeline

Hi Cherie,

Thanks for this information. And if it started Aug 15, would a 3-weeks (Sept 6) be a reasonable turnaround?

-Jan 

(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) OCAD University ________________________________________
From: Cherie Ekholm [cheriee@exchange.microsoft.com]
Sent: June-24-11 4:42 PM
To: Richards, Jan; Jeanne Spellman
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: RE: Proposed ATAG2 Timeline

So, I haven't had time to reformat this into a calendar that I can read ad evaluate, but to put some dates onto Alex's comments at the last meeting: the earliest that I can get any feedback from anyone in Office on a draft is August 15. Until that date, I can't ask for a review to start. Not sure how that plays into the other dates here, but that's what I'm working with at the moment.

Cherie

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richards, Jan
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Jeanne Spellman
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: RE: Proposed ATAG2 Timeline

Hi Jeanne,

Thanks for the info - I have removed the alternate publishing date.

June 27: Finish survey items (re: templates) July 4: NO CALL DUE TO Independence Day (US) July 11 (2hr call): Finish survey (re: metadata, model practice) July 18 (2hr call): Mopping up; Try to hold vote to publish "Regular" Public WD
 - with 3 week review period
 - include sending out comment responses July 25: Testing Considerations Aug 1: Testing Considerations (Civic Holiday CDN) Aug 8: Testing Considerations Aug 15 (2hr call): Reviewing comments received Aug 22 (2hr call): Reviewing comments received Aug 29 (2hr call): Reviewing comments received Sept 5: NO CALL DUE TO Labour Day (CDN, US) Sept 12: Vote on Last Call WD
 - with 6 week review period (e.g. Sep 13-Oct 25)
 - we will work on Implementations and Testing Considerations Oct 31-Nov 4: Tech Plenary - Reviewing Last Call comments received.
January 2012: Candidate Recommendation
 - this is more speculative, since we are guessing how long we will be in CR June 2012: Proposed Recommendation August 2013: Recommendation


(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) OCAD University ________________________________________
From: Jeanne Spellman [jeanne@w3.org]
Sent: June-23-11 8:20 PM
To: Richards, Jan
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposed ATAG2 Timeline

I will be on vacation from 25 July returning 8 August. We will have to take the vote on the 18 July or wait until after my vacation to publish the working draft.  If we have to wait for my return to publish, that will push out the dates in to process comments until September, with an accompanying ripple.

I am good with these dates if the group can get behind finishing our work on this draft by 18 July.  It normally takes two weeks to publish - I can do the advance work as much as possible, but this will be a big push for me to get the document out before 25 July, and I will need the group behind this.

jeanne

On 6/23/2011 4:26 PM, Richards, Jan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know, our group is being asked for a realistic timeline for delivering ATAG2.
>
> I'm proposing this:
>
> June 27: Finish survey items (re: templates) July 4: NO CALL DUE TO 
> Independence Day (US) July 11 (2hr call): Finish survey (re: metadata, 
> model practice) July 18 (2hr call): Mopping up; Try to hold vote to 
> publish "Regular" Public WD
>   - with 3 week review period
>   - include sending out comment responses July 25: (Alternate vote on 
> publishing WD) Aug 1: Testing Considerations (Civic Holiday CDN) Aug
> 8: Testing Considerations Aug 15 (2hr call): Reviewing comments 
> received Aug 22 (2hr call): Reviewing comments received Aug 29 (2hr
> call): Reviewing comments received Sept 5: NO CALL DUE TO Labour Day 
> (CDN, US) Sept 12: Vote on Last Call WD
>   - with 6 week review period (e.g. Sep 13-Oct 25)
>   - we will work on Implementations and Testing Considerations Oct 
> 31-Nov 4: Tech Plenary - Reviewing Last Call comments received.
> January 2012: Candidate Recommendation
>   - this is more speculative, since we are guessing how long we will 
> be in CR June 2012: Proposed Recommendation August 2013:
> Recommendation
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Hopefully we can give Jeanne the info she needs without consuming to much of Monday's call.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jan
>
>
> (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
> jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 Inclusive Design Research 
> Centre (IDRC) OCAD University
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 20:50:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 24 June 2011 20:50:20 GMT