W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2010

FW: ATAG2 B2.1.2

From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:16:26 -0400
To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F2C77FB59A1A4840A01EF5F59B1826E20A2824D00F@ocadmail.ocad.ca>
Jeanne disagreed and I see her point. I'll keep the agreed version.

Cheers,
Jan


-- 
(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844
Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/
Faculty of Design | OCAD University


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeanne Spellman [mailto:jeanne@w3.org] 
Sent: November 1, 2010 2:13 PM
To: Richards, Jan
Subject: Re: ATAG2 B2.1.2

I don't think we can eliminate the "if" clause.  it would appear that we 
are forcing simple authoring tools to provide mechanisms just for WCAG.

On 11/1/2010 1:59 PM, Richards, Jan wrote:
> On the call we approved this:
> B.2.1.2 Set Accessible Properties: If the authoring tool provides mechanisms to set properties of web content (e.g., attribute values, etc.), mechanisms are also provided to gather accessibility information required to meet the WCAG 2.0 success criteria.
>
> I suggest we simplify a bit more:
> B.2.1.2 Mechanisms are provided to set web content properties (e.g., attribute values, etc.) related to accessibility information that is required to meet the WCAG 2.0 success criteria:
> Note: Success Criterion B.3.2.4 addresses the prominence of the mechanism.
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 18:16:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 November 2010 18:16:58 GMT