W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2010

RE: AUWG survey (due before the call on Mar. 1):

From: Boland Jr., Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:03:59 -0500
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
CC: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930796C8DFBC@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Started on the survey.. first three responses..
Best, Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jan Richards
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:26 PM
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: AUWG survey (due before the call on Mar. 1):

Hi all,

Jeanne will be very busy with her UAWG duties this week (they are having
a F2F). So perhaps people can fill out the survey as shown below and
send it back to the list:

======================
(1) New proposal on replacing term: freehand drawing:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0063.html
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _x The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

Comments: why do we need to distinguish between "continuous" and "discrete"?  Those terms are highly subjective..?  It's all just "input" via a "device"?   The wording of the new proposal seems confusing to me.. Also, WCAG2.0 has definitions for "(Web) content" and "keyboard interface" - are our definitions consistent with theirs?  If not, should they be?


======================
(2) Removing term "option" from glossary
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20100210/results#xq17
  _ Remove "option"
  x_ Keep "option"
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

Comments: If "option" is used normatively in the spec, it needs to be kept (important term..)?

======================
(3) Adding "Encouraged" the note on checking (Tim's action)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0068.html
  _x Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(4) Updated intent text for B.2.1.3 Other Technologies
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0067.html
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(5) Updated intent text for B.2.2.9 Metadata for Repair
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0069.html
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(6) Various marked edits in Appendix A: Gathering Accessibility
Information from Authors:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2010/ED-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20100222/#prompting-types
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(7) Approving responses to IBM comments on the last public WD:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0070.html
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(8) E.g. added to B.1.2.2 End Product Cannot Preserve Accessibility
Information:
Point 1 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0071.html
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(9) E.g. added to B.1.2.2 Examples
Point 4 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0071.html
  _ Accept the proposal
  _ Recommend changes (add comments)
  _ The proposal needs more discussion (add comments)
  _ Disagree with the proposal
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(10) B.2.2.8 Metadata for Discovery: AA or AAA?
Point 2 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0071.html
  _ AA
  _ AAA
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================
(11) Idea of noting keyboard optimizations are good for power users
Point 3 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0071.html
  _ Don't add note (on power users)
  _ Add note (on power users)
  _ Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

======================




Cheers,
Jan
















--
(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jan.richards@utoronto.ca | 416-946-7060

Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information | University of Toronto
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 15:04:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 26 February 2010 15:04:47 GMT