W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2009

ATAG2 proposed wording to allow the Introduction to be fully informative

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:37:17 -0400
Message-ID: <4A6E01ED.1060806@utoronto.ca>
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
CC: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Following up on Tim's point that the Introduction of W3C recommendations 
are usually Informative, I have the following proposal:

We...

(a) Move the normative definition of "authoring tool" to the Glossary

(b) Place a new note in the "Notes" under Introduction that now begin 
with "ATAG 2.0 recommends that authoring tools be capable of....". The 
note will read:

1. The term "authoring tool" has a specific definition in ATAG 2.0. The 
definition, which includes several normative notes, appears in the Glossary.

(c) Move the "Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 
(WCAG) 2.0" to the "Conformance" section

(d) Merge the "This section is informative" statements throughout the 
Introduction into one statement at the top.

Cheers,
Jan


-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Lead
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information
University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 19:38:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:57 UTC