W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: B 1.1 proposed rationale

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa.it>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:36:02 +0200
To: "'WAI-AUWG List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <015501c9fed5$981b39a0$c851ace0$@it>
Sounds good for me. (eventually suggest to change "produce" with

Roberto Scano (rscano@iwa.it)
IWA/HWG International Project Manager and EMEA Coordinator 
International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild 
W3C Advisory Commitee Representative for IWA/HWG W3C 
WCAG Working Group Member - W3C ATAG Working Group Member 
Expert of ISO/TC 159/SC 4/WG 5 'Software ergonomics and human-computer
http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org
E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org
Personal web site: http://www.robertoscano.info

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jutta Treviranus
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 10:43 PM
Subject: B 1.1 proposed rationale

We are stating the obvious, but here is a proposed rationale for B1.1.

The progression between B1 to B2 to B3 is 1) it must be possible 2) 
you must support it 3) you must integrate it.

"Rationale: For the purposes of this document, WCAG 2.0 defines the 
accessible Web content requirements. To support accessible content 
production, at minimum, it must be possible to produce content that 
complies to WCAG 2.0 using the authoring tool. "

Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 07:36:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:57 UTC