- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa.it>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:36:02 +0200
- To: "'WAI-AUWG List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Sounds good for me. (eventually suggest to change "produce" with "generate"). --- Roberto Scano (rscano@iwa.it) IWA/HWG International Project Manager and EMEA Coordinator International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild W3C Advisory Commitee Representative for IWA/HWG W3C WCAG Working Group Member - W3C ATAG Working Group Member Expert of ISO/TC 159/SC 4/WG 5 'Software ergonomics and human-computer dialogues' http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org Personal web site: http://www.robertoscano.info -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jutta Treviranus Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 10:43 PM To: WAI-AUWG List Subject: B 1.1 proposed rationale We are stating the obvious, but here is a proposed rationale for B1.1. The progression between B1 to B2 to B3 is 1) it must be possible 2) you must support it 3) you must integrate it. "Rationale: For the purposes of this document, WCAG 2.0 defines the accessible Web content requirements. To support accessible content production, at minimum, it must be possible to produce content that complies to WCAG 2.0 using the authoring tool. " Jutta
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 07:36:44 UTC