Hi all, Here's the Word doc with the terms as revised on today's call. Cheers, Jan Jan Richards wrote: > Hi all, > > On Monday, Tim and I took an action to work on the Glossary. We decided > to split things so that Tim will be reviewing the entire document for > required definitions and writing some framing text. My part of the work > was to review/revise the current glossary terms to ensure we harmonize > with WCAG 2.0 where we can and that we our definitions are clear and > necessary (whether still used in doc). > > My review and proposed revisions are in an attached Word doc with change > tracking on. Hopefully, I'll be working with Jeanne to turn these into > survey questions. > > Cheers, > Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 January 2009 22:08:54 GMT