Processing ATAG2 Comments (comment: "Try to reduce success criterias")

Comment at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-atag2-comments/2009May/0001.html

My comments marked with JR:

========
> I think it's worth considering to merge success criterias which differ
> in wcag level only, e.g:
> B.3.1.1 Accessible Options Prominent (Level A)
> B.3.1.2 Accessible Options Prominent (Level AA)
> B.3.1.3 Accessible Options Prominent (Level AAA)
> 
> Some of these success criterias are listed one after the other, in other
> cases different success criterias are in between the
> "similar-except-for-wcag-level" criterias.

JR: When we had these formulated as one "Relative Priority" Checkpoint, 
it was a source of confusion. That said, I'm open to ideas for more 
intuitive phrasing. Just remember it will also require reworking the 
levels of conformance explanations.


Cheers,
Jan

-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Lead
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information
University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896