RE: AUWG Action Item: Level A->Minimum, Level AA->??, Level AAA->???

Agree.

---
Roberto Scano (rscano@iwa-italy.org)
IWA/HWG International Project Manager and EMEA Coordinator 
International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild 
W3C Advisory Commitee Representative for IWA/HWG W3C 
WCAG Working Group Member - W3C ATAG Working Group Member 
Expert of ISO/TC 159/SC 4/WG 5 'Software ergonomics and human-computer
dialogues'
http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org
E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org
Personal web site: http://www.robertoscano.info

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Richards
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 4:55 PM
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: AUWG Action Item: Level A->Minimum, Level AA->??, Level AAA->???


Instead of saying:
A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (Level A)
A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (Level AA)
A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (Level AAA)

I suggest we follow WCAG 2.0 and use the terms "Minimum" and "Enhanced".
Since WCAG doesn't have a term for "medium" and suggest "Intermediate" :

A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (Minimum)
A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (Intermediate)
A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (Enhanced)

Cheers,
Jan



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1749 - Release Date: 27/10/2008
7.57