Minutes

IRC Logs

Action Items
ACTION: JR, JS: Update http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080929/WD-ATAG20-20080929.html#intro-rel-wcag
ACTION: Jan and Jeanne to come up with rationale text for Part A
ACTION: JS to Use prompt instead of cue
ACTION: JS to create an issue with the text of the editors note on definition of Authoring Tool and delete that editor's note from the guidelines.


Text of Minutes
W3C
WAI AU
29 Sep 2008

Agenda

See also: IRC log
Attendees

Present
    AndrewR, Greg_Pisocky, Jan, Jeanne, Sueann
Regrets
    Ann_M., Tim_B.
Chair
    Jan
Scribe
    greg

Contents

    * Topics
    * Summary of Action Items

<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080929/WD-ATAG20-20080929

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080310/

AI: Jan and Jean to come up with rationale text for Part A

Jan - rationale is not to push this group's scope into the arenas of other standards groups concerned with general accessibility issues

Jan also seeking thoughts on the issue checking

Andrew the whole concept of dropping benchmark documents deserves to be addressed

Jan: Yes we need to address the whole relationship to WCAG section

<Jan> ACTION: JR, JS: Update http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080929/WD-ATAG20-20080929.html#intro-rel-wcag [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - JR,

<scribe> ACTION: Jan and Jeanne to come up with rationale text for Part A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-22 - And Jeanne to come up with rationale text for Part A [on Jan Richards - due 2008-10-06].

<Jan> QUESTIONS: Rationale for narrowing Part A, Checking B.2.2, rationale for removing "Benchmark Documents"

<jeanne> If authors are asked for any information as content is being added or updated (e.g., by an image modification dialog), then the tool also prominently asks for any accessibility information required for that content to meet WCAG Level A.

B.2.1 instead of going from "cued" to "ask" what about using the term "prompt" ?

<Jan> ACTION: JS to Use prompt instead of cue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-23 - Use prompt instead of cue [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-10-06].

B.2.2.1 Another example: A tool that inserts images should also check for alt text

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080929/WD-ATAG20-20080929.html#intro-def-au

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080929/WD-ATAG20-20080929.html#def-Authoring-Permission

Topics for Face to Face agenda

<jeanne> ACTION: JS to create an issue with the text of the editors note on definition of Authoring Tool and delete that editor's note from the guidelines. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-24 - Create an issue with the text of the editors note on definition of Authoring Tool and delete that editor's note from the guidelines. [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-10-06].

All need to register even if attendign by phone

Register and indicate participation by phone so Jeann can do the count

Discuss issues in chunks for 1st day and do the entire draft on day 2

<jeanne> +1

<Jan> JR: ideas for topics: Defn of authoring tools re: future events; checking issues...

What are some items you would like to see fixed before it becomes CR?

<Jan> JS: Top to bottom review to include check for language consistency

<Jan> JS: Levels of conformance

<Jan> JR: PRINCIPLE A.1: Authoring tool user interfaces must follow applicable accessibility guidelines

<Jan> JR: Relationship between templates, automatic generation and future events.

<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/10f2f

<jeanne> Meeting on 3 October
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Jan and Jeanne to come up with rationale text for Part A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: JR, JS: Update http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20080929/WD-ATAG20-20080929.html#intro-rel-wcag [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to create an issue with the text of the editors note on definition of Authoring Tool and delete that editor's note from the guidelines. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Use prompt instead of cue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/29-au-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]