W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Authoring tools and WCAG 2.0's "Accessibility Supported"

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa.it>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 21:29:05 +0200
Message-ID: <6B7DE7375B27472B98FE3D6CAF9149CB@hprs>
To: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "WAI-AUWG List" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>

I think that for accessibility supported in ATAG shall means the same inside 
WCAG: a developer can use technologies like XHTML, CSS, JS (for Web based 
user interfaces) and use them in a manner that are accessible by assistive 
tecnologies. A solution for script-based interfaces and for RIA will be to 
require, in baseline, to refer to WAI-ARIA.
Btw, referring to WCAG 2 for User interface accessibility requirements refer 
indirectly also to WAI-ARIA (if i remember well, is guideline 4.1, success 
criteria 4.1.2).

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
To: "WAI-AUWG List" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:44 PM
Subject: Authoring tools and WCAG 2.0's "Accessibility Supported"


>
> Just a thought...
>
> Looking at WCAG 2.0's concept of "Accessibility Supported"
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#accessibility-supporteddef) I started
> wondering about support that authoring tools might provide.
>
> Checkers aren't likely advanced enough yet but I can imagine
> multi-format checkers that would have settings re: which technologies
> the user believed to be accessibility supported. (or similarly at the
> stage of choosing formats)
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 16/05/2008 
7.42
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 19:41:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:07 GMT