RE: AUWG Poll #2: 18 September 2007

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Richards
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:52 PM
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: AUWG Poll #2: 18 September 2007


AUWG Poll #2:

-----

Instructions:

- Proposed rewordings, issues etc. are listed.

- Members in good standing (http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/members) have the
following "response" options:
   A: Accept the proposal
   B: Accept the proposal with the changes (then specify changes)
   C: Do not accept the proposal (then specify reason)

- Once 3 people have accepted a proposal (assume my vote is to accept
unless noted) and none have rejected it, I'll start a 3 day timer. If
the timer expires with no rejections then the proposal is assumed to be
carried

- to keep things organized, please respond to the poll as a whole rather
than to individual questions.

-----

Proposal 1: The "modified" text in "Success Criteria" section in 
"Organization of the ATAG 2.0 Document"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#Org
-Success-Criteria

Response: A

-----

Proposal 2: The "modified" text in "Relationship to the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#Rel
ationship-To-WCAG

Response: A

-----

Proposal 3: "Guideline 1.3"'s new position, rationale and success 
criteria wording.
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#che
ck-tool-conventions

Response: A

-----

Proposal 4: Conformance claim disclaimer wording.
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#con
f-Disclaimer

Response: ??

-----

Proposal 5: "New text" in Definition of "authoring session"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def
-Authoring-Session

Response: ??

-----

Proposal 6: "Modified" Definition of "checking (accessibility)"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def
-Checking

Response: ??

-----

Proposal 7: Remove "content type" and replace by Technology (Web 
Content) - the new definition was developed jointly with the WCAG-WG
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def
-Content-Type
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def
-Web-Content-Technology

-----

Proposal 8: "Modified" Definition of "Content Generation"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def
-Content-Generation

Response: ??

-----

End of Poll #2


Cheers,
Jan

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:08:55 UTC