W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2007

RE: AUWG Teleconference on 9 July 2007 4pm-5pm ET

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:42:29 +0200
To: "'Jan Richards'" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "'WAI-AUWG List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002e01c7c23f$c4fece70$4efc6b50$@org>

Possible regrets.
One note. In the last WCAG Teleconf there was some discussion about validity
and referral to ATAG.
In one success criteria there Is explanation that is possible to use invalid
markup if this helps accessibility. My question is: ATAG 2.0 shall use the
same reference when will refer to WCAG 2.0 (Web-Based Authoring Tools and in
general authoring tools that generate markup)?


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Richards
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:35 PM
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: AUWG Teleconference on 9 July 2007 4pm-5pm ET


Hi everyone,

Just a reminder that there will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 9
July 2007 at 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm ET:

Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au

Agenda:

1. ATAG 2.0 Development
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070625/WD-ATAG20-20070625.html

Let's try and get consensus on the following:
- Guideline A.3.1 [For the authoring tool user interface] Ensure all 
functionality is available from a keyboard.
- Guideline A.4.1 [For the authoring tool user interface] Make text 
content readable and understandable
- Guideline A.4.2 [For the authoring tool user interface] Make 
functionality predictable.

(see here for original wording 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ATAG20-20061207/)

2. F2F at Plenary (8-10 November)

(Techniques reviews ON HOLD UNTIL Techniques updated to reflect new draft)

Please send regrets to the list.


Cheers,
Jan
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 15:43:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:06 GMT