W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: Notes form Sept 11 AUWG conference call

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:24:08 -0400
Message-ID: <45080678.3000204@utoronto.ca>
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Hi,

I will sign myself up for a technique review from two perspectives (1) 
the DreamWeaver MX2004 Design view (ie. WYSIWYG view) and (2) the 
DreamWeaver MX2004 Code view.

Cheers,
Jan

Jan Richards wrote:
> Attendees:
> - Jan Richards
> - Greg Pisocky
> - Tim Boland
> 
> The three of us agreed that a good way to move forward on the techniques would 
> be for each member to choose a particular authoring tool (or authoring 
> function - e.g. the code editing view of a tool that also offers a WYSIWYG 
> view) and go through the techniques from the perspective of that tool (you may 
> choose to take the view of the developer, the buyer, etc.). The idea is to 
> really focus on the applicability statements and techniques - is anything 
> inaccurate or missing? Do the icons provide a useful guide or not?
> 
> In order to avoid duplication, please register your intent on the mailing 
> list. Here's a list of possible perspectives (others are possible):
> 
> WYSIWYG tool (e.g. Dreamweaver's WYSIWYG view)
> Code level tool
> Object-Oriented tool (e.g. Visio)
> Indirect authoring tool (e.g. Desire2Learn)
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ended early (4:20 ET)
> 

-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information Studies
University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 13:24:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:06 GMT