W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2006

RE: Notes form Sept 11 AUWG conference call

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 23:51:39 +0200
To: "'Jan Richards'" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004001c6d5ec$77941770$2201a8c0@rsnbiwa>

Hi Jan,
What about the plug-ins like Xstandard, Java Editors, etc. ?


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Richards
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:25 PM
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: Notes form Sept 11 AUWG conference call



Attendees:
- Jan Richards
- Greg Pisocky
- Tim Boland

The three of us agreed that a good way to move forward on the techniques
would 
be for each member to choose a particular authoring tool (or authoring 
function - e.g. the code editing view of a tool that also offers a WYSIWYG 
view) and go through the techniques from the perspective of that tool (you
may 
choose to take the view of the developer, the buyer, etc.). The idea is to 
really focus on the applicability statements and techniques - is anything 
inaccurate or missing? Do the icons provide a useful guide or not?

In order to avoid duplication, please register your intent on the mailing 
list. Here's a list of possible perspectives (others are possible):

WYSIWYG tool (e.g. Dreamweaver's WYSIWYG view)
Code level tool
Object-Oriented tool (e.g. Visio)
Indirect authoring tool (e.g. Desire2Learn)

Cheers,
Jan




Ended early (4:20 ET)
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 21:51:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:06 GMT