W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: New Editor's Draft of the ATAG 2.0 Techniques

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:14:32 -0400
Message-ID: <44BF8FC8.5050109@utoronto.ca>
To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
CC: Barry Feigenbaum <feigenba@us.ibm.com>

Here's some feedback from Barry and my comments in-line. The changes are 
editorial so I have updated the draft in place at:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2006/WD-ATAG20techs-20060711/WD-ATAG20techs-20060711.html 



Barry Feigenbaum wrote:
> 
> Some input, more to come on part B
> 
> 
> You need to do a spelling pass using US (vs CA/UK) English.  I see some 
> examples like colour (vs color)

DONE with MS Word - plus I found and corrected some duplicated words etc.

>    Example: A.2.5-2.1(a): When a <table> element is selected and the 
> "delete" operation is performed, the entire table id *** should be is 
> *** deleted including sub-elements (<tr> and <td>) and any text content 
> etc. within the table. are also be deleted.

DONE

> Technique A.4.2-1.1 [Sufficient]:@@BAF to add other techniques?@@  Will 
> do ASAP.  when is the deadline?

We can put this out as a draft without them but the sooner the better. 
Can we say the end of August?

> Technique B.1.5-1.3 [Advisory] : Providing pre-authored graphical 
> content in content types that allow for accessible annotation to be 
> included in the files, such as SMIL [SMIL], PNG [PNG], and SVG [SVG]. 
>  *** [xxx] not hyperlinks ***

DONE

> Is it a problem that not all criteria have "Sufficient" techniques?

I'm trying to make sure we have at least one sufficient technique for 
each. I just checked and I think we do.



Cheers,
Jan
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:15:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:06 GMT