Re: New Proposed Glossary.

At the Quality Assurance Interest Group (QAIG) meeting at the W3C Technical 
Plenary (TP), there was a discussion (referenced in [1]) of the W3C 
Glossary System.   Perhaps the WCAG glossary work could be 
submitted/considered for this W3C Glossary System when appropriate?

Also,  it was mentioned to me that the WAI EOWG was discussing glossary 
issues at the TP meeting (referenced as well in [2]) .  Is there 
coordination between WCAG WG and EOWG on glossary issues?

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST


[1]: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/27-qa-minutes.html
[2]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2006/02f2f.html


  At 05:34 PM 2/28/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>xmlns:ns0="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">
>
>Please look over these definitions.
>
>
>
>This is a reformatting and compilation of all the edits and current 
>proposals for changes.
>
>
>
><http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/02/28-proposed-appendixA.html>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/02/28-proposed-appendixA.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>thanks
>
>
>Gregg
>
>------------------------
>
>Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
>Director - Trace R & D Center
>University of Wisconsin-Madison
><<http://trace.wisc.edu/>http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848
>For a list of our list discussions 
><http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/>http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/
>
>The Player for my DSS sound file is at 
><http://tinyurl.com/dho6b>http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
>
><http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
>
>
>
>