Thanks, Jan. I think that would be clearer. Loretta On 11/24/05 6:43 AM, "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca> wrote: > Loretta, > > Thanks for your feedback. That's a good point re: A.2.1. > > In Part A there is some disparity between the requirements on Web-based > tools vs. non-Web-based tools. This is because a set of W3C approved > requirements already exists for Web-based tools (i.e. WCAG) but not for > non-Web-based tools. The group has dealt with this by bringing together > a set of requirements for non-Web-based tools (based on WCAG, UAAG, and > other works) but the result is invariably different for the two broad > sets of tools. > > However, it seems in this case that the requirements are more different > than they need to be. Therefore I suggest we change the "For Web-Based > Interface Components:" note from: > > Meeting Checkpoint A.0.1 will serve to meet this checkpoint. > > to more precise wording - like that in A.2.7: > > Meeting Checkpoint A.0.1 will serve to meet success criteria 1 and 2 of > this checkpoint. Browser functionality may be relied on to achieve some > parts of success criteria 3 and 4 (e.g. Single-key access to move > content focus to the next enabled control in user interface, > Key-plus-modifier-key (or single-key) access to "undo") as long as the > applicable user agent(s) are specified in the conformance profile. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Jan > > > > > Loretta Guarino Reid wrote: >> I donšt understand how web content that meets Checkpoint A.0.1 satisfies >> Checkpoint A.2.1 success criteria 3 and 4. >> >> >> ///Loretta Guarino Reid/ >> >> lguarino@adobe.com >> >> Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering >>Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 15:41:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:05 GMT