- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:02:10 -0400
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
What is the motivation/rationale behind the proposed changes? Consistency with UAAG/WCAG? Something else? I believe Wendy Chisholm posted the proposed details of a WCAG conformance claim in a message also.. Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST PS - I can review the proposal from a SpecGL perspective.. At 12:16 PM 9/13/2005 -0400, you wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to propose some changes to the conformance section that go >just slightly beyond being editorial. > >For comparison: >Proposed: (see Conformance section in attached document) >Old: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/guidelines.html#Conformance > >Highlights: >- calling out differences between Part A and B priority definitions >- 2.2 intro text and 2.2.1 Claimants section rolled into a new section >called 2.2.1 Conditions >- A new section 2.2.2 Conformance Claims takes a few pieces of info out of >the conformance profile (this comes closer to matching the UAAG 1.0 structure) > > > > >Cheers, >Jan > >-- >Jan Richards, M.Sc. >User Interface Design Specialist >Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) >Faculty of Information Studies >University of Toronto > > Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca > Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca > Phone: 416-946-7060 > Fax: 416-971-2896 > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 20:03:12 UTC