W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Fwd: Review of ATAG 1 last call against SpecGL last call

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:53:45 -0500 (EST)
To: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0501110550080.13554@homer.w3.org>

OK, might as well take this as official notification that the thing exists
then. If I receive further comments I will pass them on.

Tim, if you have any different conclusions to mine I would be glad if you
cc'ed me or the qa list - you probably have a better understanding of specGL
than I do. Which means the differences are interesting in terms of how an
outsider understands specGL.

And just by the by, the MUTAT tool, which is designed to allow people to run
this kind of test and produce an EARL result which could be transformed into
something like the HTML tale, or queried as part of a larger collection of
RDF, is under repair by me. One of the test cases I am working on is SpecGL,
but I could also do an ATAG-based version if you think this would be helpful.



On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tim Boland wrote:

>fyi - I also started on such an evaluation on ATAG 2 LC but did not finish
>it yet..
>>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:36:55 -0500 (EST)
>>From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
>>To: www-qa@w3.org
>>Hi folks,
>>I have looked at the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines last call
>>document, and done a review of how well it meets the last call draft of
>>SpecGL. The summary is that they conform to all but one requirement, and
>>noted in the draft that they expected to conform to this final requirement by
>>the time the last call draft was published. They also implement many of the
>>good practices.
>>I will be sending the review to the group tomorrow because it is late
>>already, but if anyone has time to look over it and wants to comment quickly
>>it is at http://www.w3.org/2005/01/cmn-atag-review
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2005 10:53:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:52 UTC