Re: Minutes from ATAG Concall of May 2, 2005

• From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
• Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 08:53:16 -0400
• To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20050503084228.02204bd8@mailserver.nist.gov>

I would prefer using "conformance model" rather than "conformance scheme",
if we are presenting a conformance model in the applicable section of 
ATAG2.0, because
the QA Specification Guidelines[1] describes Requirement 06 in terms of the
conformance model..

Thanks and best wishes..
Tim Boland NIST

[1]:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/

04:43 PM 5/2/2005 -0400, you wrote:


>JR: Guideline 1 items were added. Now are changes that initiated like
>numbering. Conformance had to be moved above the guidelines. New conformance
>scheme that was proposed last week has now been added.

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 12:54:05 UTC