W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: checkpoint 2.3 edits

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:49:23 -0500
Message-ID: <1101084563.41a137931392f@webmail.utoronto.ca>
To: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Yes, that's ok.

In the conformance profiles section (3.2.3) the evaluator will already specify 
the formats for which the tool is attempting to conform - so this paranthetical 
text is not necessary.

-Jan

-- 
Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist 
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto 

  Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca 
  Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
  Phone: 416-946-7060 
  Fax:   416-971-2896


Quoting Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>:

> In success criteria for 2.3 we state:
> 
> All markup and content that is automatically generated (in formats 
> for which there is a published WCAG techniques
> documents <#def-wcag-tech-doc> for meeting each WCAG
> checkpoint) by the authoring tool (i.e. not authored "by hand" 
> <#def-Authored-By-Hand>) /must/ always conform to WCAG
> <#priority-Relationship-To-WCAG-web>.
> 
> 
> We should delete the first phrase in parenthese -(in formats for 
> which there is a published WCAG techniques
> documents <#def-wcag-tech-doc> for meeting each WCAG
> checkpoint)-, because we don't want this limited to only the occasion 
> when WCAG compliant formats are used.
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> Jutta
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 00:49:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:51 UTC