Re: clarification and question

Hi Tim,

Yes, it is possible to move things back, especially due to the 
unexpectedly major nature of the recent changes. I think that the push 
we made to finish has been positive as it has led to quite a bit of 
progress.

Cheers,
Jan

Tim Boland wrote:
> 
> Just to be clear, my most recent email to the list was to comment on 
> Jan's rewrite of Jutta's success criteria.  My earlier email was 
> commenting directly on Jutta's success criteria.
> Sorry for any confusion.
> 
> On another point, I'm wondering what is the motivation for voting on 
> last call of ATAG2.0 by Nov 15?  It seems to me like we are making quite 
> a few non-editorial (substantive) changes to ATAG2.0 now, and I would 
> like adequate time to review the changes made in the context of the 
> entire document before announcing last call.  I  think we should review 
> the document one last time to make sure it's really what we want, even 
> if it takes an extra week or two.
> 
> Does anybody else in the group feel "rushed"?    Is it possible to move 
> the Nov15 date back by a week or two?   What do other members of the 
> group think?  I apologize if there is something I'm not understanding..
> 
> Thanks and best wishes,
> Tim Boland NIST
> 
> 

-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896

Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 15:50:31 UTC