W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: ATAG 2.0 draft published to TR page

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:12:46 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20040301081057.021bde68@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org 

The abstract referenced in the link mentioned uses ISO16071:2002 
date.   The reference used in ATAG is 2002(E)

  At 03:35 PM 2/28/2004 +0100, you wrote:


>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
>To: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>; "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 1:28 PM
>Subject: Re: ATAG 2.0 draft published to TR page
>
>
>"The authoring tool interface must conform to [ISO16071]".
>
>the link refer to the:
>ISO/TS 16071:2002
>
>but in the ISO web site there is the:
>ISO/TS 16071:2003
>http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CombinedQueryResult.CombinedQueryResult?queryString=16071
>
>Anyone knows the differences?
Received on Monday, 1 March 2004 08:13:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:03 GMT