W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Some questions re: Configurability in ATAG2.0

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:21:37 +0200
Message-ID: <001d01c4546e$0dd2c8b0$0200a8c0@iwars>
To: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "Tim Boland" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
To: "Tim Boland" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Some questions re: Configurability in ATAG2.0


Our convention is to use "author" as the user of the tool. BTW: We
should have
a convention for the person who uses the Web content that is the output
of the
tool. I suggest "Web content consumer" since "reader" or "viewer" are
both too
limiting.

Roberto Scano:
I suggest to make also a difference between content manager (user that
create contents with WYSIWYG editors like CMS where there isn't the need
to know the markup creation) and author (people that knows the code).
Agree also about Web Content Consumer.



Jan Richards:
I agree. I could see this as P2, but probabably not as P1, as I don't
think it
is absolutely critical to the production of accessible content.

Roberto Scano:
Agree. Set P2 is best.
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:21:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:49 UTC