>> 1. Finalization of the implementation techniques document structure. >JR trying out presentation ideas in >http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech3.html >http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech4.html >Begins with checkpoint, then success criteria, followed by the techniques. >Success criteria are in form of table. Also made new icons. Wants to know if >we need the icons at all to both classify techniques _and_ the examples? >Perhaps they are only helpful at example level. Wants feedback on this. > >JT pointed out the history of icons as a means to help a developer zoom in >on just their area of focus. A condensed version in other words. Two notes about the use of icons and images. 1. The icons are too small and are not resizable: this means that low vision people have difficulty to see them and the images can cause problems for cognitive or not-too-much tecnical users. 2. The [D] Link is not suggested... in WCAG Working Group for WCAG 2.0 we are "deprecating" it due that the screen reader found the same link ([D]) for a lot of images.Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:35:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:03 GMT