W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Fwd: Re: New ATAG 2 and ATAG 2 Techs internal drafts

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:08:58 -0500
Message-ID: <3FB00C7A.A811629C@utoronto.ca>
To: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Hi Tim,

For Checkpoint 3.8, I believe we intended to at least showcase ALL WCAG
practices (Level 1, 2, and 3) even if the authoring tools do not yet
actually support them with checking and correction, etc. It was
specifically made a P2 checkpoint, so that tools could still be single-A
conformant without meeting it. 

For Checkpoint 4.1, I think you may be right.

Cheers,
Jan


Tim Boland wrote:
> 
> Same issue for Checkpoint 4.1 as for Checkpoint 3.8 -  see earlier message
> forwarded below

Tim Boland wrote:
> 
> Additional Note:
> In success criteria for checkpoint 3.8 reference is made to "meeting
> requirements of WCAG" but checkpoint is listed as "priority 2" (maybe
> should be relative priority instead?) .  Just a note (fyi in context of
> discussion at last telecon) for the future when the concept of relative
> priority is reviewed.
> 
> Best, Tim Boland NIST



-- 
Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto

  Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
  Web:   http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/jan/richards.html
  Phone: 416-946-7060
  Fax:   416-971-2896
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 17:08:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:48 UTC