W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2002

Dealing with relative priority checkpoints

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 16:44:42 -0500
Message-ID: <3C62F54A.AD6DA54C@utoronto.ca>
To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Relatives are nice and all, but sometimes they can overstay their
welcome. So it is with the ATAG Relative Priority Checkpoints.

Attached is a proposal to kick them off the couch where they haven't
been doing much (i.e. the main ATAG techniques list) and put them to
work (in a new appendix, organized by WCAG checkpoint and better suited,
I think, to the production of high quality relative priority
techniques). This reserves the main techniques page for more general
techniques that are not tied to a single WCAG checkpoint.

Thoughts? A potential problem is that this may make generating the
techniques draft from the source documents more complicated.

Note: All the details of the proposal are only worked out down to WCAG
1.5.

Cheers,
- Jan


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

Jan Richards
UI Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
University of Toronto

jan.richards@utoronto.ca
Phone: (416) 946-7060
Fax: (416) 971-2896

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 16:45:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:47 UTC