W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2001


From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:59:44 -0500 (EST)
To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0112031158450.12129-100000@tux.w3.org>
Yep, I think this is a good question.

Maybe we should rephrase it "do I use ATAG 1.0 or Wombat?" (I think there is
a question on "who should use ATAG").



On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Phill Jenkins wrote:

  I would like to suggest another question to put at the end after the
  suggested additional questions:

   Who should use "Wombat"?

  Authoring tool developers should use "Wombat" now that a public draft is
  available.  This is in anticipation of needing implementation experience
  before achieving candidate recommendation.  Please note that the draft may
  change etc.etc.etc.

  If this is not the case, then why point them to ATAG 1.0 if we know all the

  Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
  IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
  11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able

Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 3 December 2001 11:59:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:46 UTC