- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 05:23:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Sure, but we decided we specifically wanted to mention 4 weeks as the time to be offered developers (this is much better than the current "a week or two") and the possiblity of waiting a little more for an imminent improvement. So your proposal would need to be rewritten in any case. It is generally good to have a proposal that could be cut/pasted into place - although commenting on why as you did is of course critically important. (If you want to challenge Jan for the action item I am sure eh would be glad to offer it, or you can have one of mine instead... <grin/>) cheers Charles On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Phill Jenkins wrote: > + Action someone: propose update for the text we have on our reviews page I thought that is what I did in the e-mail posted [1] to the AU list? [1] ATAG Conformance Reviews http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2001JulSep/0108.html Regards, Phill Jenkins
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 05:23:27 UTC