W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Face to face agenda

From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:46:16 -0500
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF1A817852.1B164045-ON86256AC0.00133B1F@raleigh.ibm.com >
OK. I read the section 8 on eval techniques - good start..

I would be willing to present the latest "IBM Software accessibility
evaluation techniques" [not published yet] as input to the working group.

And I would also like to discuss the working group's "process" for posting
conformance evaluations as described on http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews/ ,
specifically the section titled "Note about conformance reviews"

Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able

Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>@w3.org on 08/31/2001 08:38:14 PM

Sent by:  w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org

To:   Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>
cc:   <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Face to face agenda

That is the current section * on evaluation techniques - in the current
available as http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WD-ATAG10-TECHS-20010801/eval

And yes, we should be talking about it.



On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Giorgio Brajnik wrote:


  I would propose also a discussion aimed at producing a draft about the
  evaluation methodology (something we talked about in Amsterdam).

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 23:46:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:46 UTC