Re: Relative Priority note for Wombat 3.1.

Just to repeat what I sid in the meeting today:

agree that 9.1 and 13.10 don't need to be here.

I think 14.2 meand that we do have to change the basic functionalirty note,
either to point out that it is only relevant to level A or double-A, or
extend it a bit to add required functionality in the case of tools looking
for triple-A.

At the moment I am preferring the latter, but I think I need to think about
it first.

cheers

Charles

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Jan Richards wrote:

  Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  > 14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will
  > facilitate comprehension of the page. [priority 3]

  JR: Hmmm. This works, but it necessitates changing the "required basic
  functionality" statement, since that assumes the orignal object is not
  plain text.

  Cheers,
  Jan

  /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

  Jan Richards
  Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
  University of Toronto

  jan.richards@utoronto.ca
  Tel: (416) 946-7060  Fax: (416) 971-2896

  /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 14:15:03 UTC